Is it true that brake rotors must be checked for stamped minimum thickness regardless of other conditions?

Brake rotors play a crucial role in the braking system, and their condition is vital for vehicle safety. While checking the stamped minimum thickness of the brake rotors is an important part of the inspection process, it's not necessary to check them under all conditions. Vehicles may have rotors that are still functional and safe even if they are above the minimum thickness due to various factors like wear patterns, use, and environmental conditions.

In general, a thorough inspection will consider the overall condition of the rotors—including warping, cracking, and other wear indicators—and not solely rely on thickness alone. For instance, if rotors are found to be in good condition with sufficient material and are functioning correctly, they can still be acceptable for use even if they fall below the stamped minimum in certain scenarios. This is especially relevant in everyday driving circumstances where continuous assessment of brake performance is key.

The above rationale emphasizes that while minimum thickness is a guideline, it should be assessed in context with other factors affecting brake performance. Thus, checking for stamped minimum thickness is not an absolute requirement in every situation, affirming that the statement in the question is false.